"There is a principle which is a BAR against all information, which is used as 'PROOF' against all arguments; and which cannot fail to keep man in everlasting ignorance; that principle is condemnation before investigation." Herbert Spencer

Because of the Federal Record of Congress 13 Statutue 223, page 306 Chap. 173, Section 182 [go to/turn to image 306] June 30, 1864: territory; which killed state sovereignty/jurisdiction, affecting 37 states, what STATE really has true, Constitutional jurisdiction? /Case: See 9-10-2015 Houston-Lufkin Tax Division case in PDF here, and link to online case here = DECOPAGE!!! Page 306: Sec . 182. "Word “state” to include “ territories,” and District of Columbia", "And be it further enacted, That wherever the word state is used in this act, it shall be construed to include the territories and the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the provisions of this act. Approved, June 30, 1864."

"EVERY taxpayer is a Cestui Que Trust [A Cestui Que Trust is a piece of paper and not you a living human with arms and legs] having sufficient interest in preventing abuse of the trust to be recognized in the field of this court's prerogative jurisdiction as relator in the proceedings to set sovereign authority in motion by action" (State of Wisconsin upon the Relation of Harry W. Bolens, Plaintiff in Error, v. James A. Frear, Secretary of State of the State of Wisconsin, Andrew H. Dahl, State Treasurer, et al., 231 U.S. 616 (1913)). Full Citation: State of Wisconsin upon the Relation of Harry W. Bolens, Plaintiff in Error, v. James A. Frear, Secretary of State of the State of Wisconsin, Andrew H. Dahl, State Treasurer, et al., 231 U.S. 616 (1913). Available at: Legal Information Institute. Wisconsin ex rel. Bolens v. Frear, Opinion of the Court. Available at: Wikisource. (Wisconsin ex rel. Bolens v. Frear - Opinion of the Court). This decision highlights the concept that public office is indeed a public trust, emphasizing the fiduciary duty public officials owe to the public. It underscores the legal standing of taxpayers to initiate actions to prevent misuse or abuse of public trust, reinforcing their role as beneficiaries with a vested interest in the proper administration of government duties. When you think about that “EVERY TAX PAYOR IS A CESTUI QUE TRUST” and a Cestui Que Trust is a piece of paper -your social security beneficiary account- then it can’t be a living human being with arms and legs and a living soul (body plus breath equal a living soul)!

• 1840 Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom
• Public Law 103-150 (U.S. Apology Resolution) — To acknowledge the 100th anniversary of the January 17, 1893 overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawai‘i, and to offer an apology to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the United States.
  Note: The “United States” referenced herein refers to the Title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions (15)(A), defining "UNITED STATES" as a federal corporation usurping as the new Rome Vatican occupation as the District of Columbia, a separate government similarly named "UNITED STATES" created by the Act of 1871 not to exceed 10 square miles.
• Natural rights acknowledged under customary and international law

📜 Hawaiian Kingdom Legal Foundation

This sovereign protection is grounded in the 1840 Constitution of the Ko Hawaiʻi Pae ʻĀina the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands, which states:

"God hath made of one blood all nations of men to dwell on the earth, in unity and blessedness. God has also bestowed certain rights alike on all men and all chiefs, and all people of all lands. These are some of the rights which He has given alike to every man and every chief of correct deportment; life, limb, liberty, freedom from oppression; the earnings of his hands and the productions of his mind..."
— ibid 1840 Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom (HarveyKuKeliikoa.com

"It is therefore our fixed decree, That no law shall be enacted which is at variance with the word of the Lord Jehovah, or at variance with the general spirit of His word."
— ibid

Slavery by Currency: The Great Hawaiian Betrayal

The Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands operated on real money—gold and silver. This was the lawful standard of exchange, rooted in justice, honest trade, and biblical law. In economic terms, "fiat currency" refers to money that has value because a government declares it legal (not lawful) tender, not because it is backed by a physical commodity like gold.

The U.S. occupiers abolished this system, replacing it with a fiat currency created from nothing—backed not by gold, not by silver, but by debt and coercion.

18 U.S. Code § 1583 – Enticement into Slavery:
“Whoever kidnaps, entices, decoys, or carries away any other person, with intent that such other person be held as a slave… shall be fined… or imprisoned…”

The modern plantation isn't sugar. It's debt-based money. The U.S. has turned Hawaiians into economic slaves, forced to labor under a fake legal entity (“State of Hawaii”) with no gold, no sovereignty, and no lawful consent. This is not freedom—it’s fiat bondage.

The Public Law 103-150

Research Tools

• Kanawai Kivila (1859)
• Hawaiian Laws (vol 1)
• Hawaiian Laws (vol 2)
• Thurston Laws & The Deception
• Hawaiian Legal Precedents (Justia)
• Kake v. Horton (1860)
• Schooner Robert Lewers v. Kekauoha (1902)

🔥 Sovereignty Suppressed: State v. Lorenzo (1994)

Court: Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Date: October 27, 1994
Citation: 77 Haw. 219, 883 P.2d 641

🧑🏽‍⚖️ Background

Anthony Lorenzo, a proud Native Hawaiian, stood against the illegal occupying force masquerading as the “State of Hawaii.” His alleged “crime”? Driving without a license — an alleged offense committed under a jurisdiction Lorenzo boldly declared as invalid and fraudulent.

Lorenzo invoked the truth that the Kingdom of Hawai‘i, unlawfully overthrown in 1893 by U.S.-backed insurgents, had never lawfully ceded sovereignty. Therefore, the U.S.-created State of Hawaii and its puppet judiciary possessed zero lawful authority over him or any Kanaka Maoli.

⚖️ Court’s Evasion, Not Refutation

The corrupt corporate (co-pirate) court did not refute Lorenzo’s central claim that the Kingdom still lawfully exists — instead, it cowardly dismissed the case by declaring that he didn’t present “enough evidence.” This is the tell-tale tactic of a system trying to bury the truth without exposing itself to the light of lawful examination.

Key Quote:
“Lorenzo did not present any evidence that the Kingdom of Hawai‘i is currently recognized by the United States or any other entity as a sovereign nation.”

🔥 Translation: The U.S. doesn’t recognize it — therefore we won't. Truth doesn’t matter. Occupation stands.

🚨 Exposing the Hidden Treason

• The U.S. and State of Hawaii never disclosed the key fact that there was no lawful treaty of annexation—only a fraudulent joint resolution.
• The so-called “State of Hawaii” is an illegal corporate (co-pirate) fiction masquerading as lawful government under U.S. code and U.S. occupation law.
• Public Law 103-150 (1993) — the U.S. Congress itself confessed to the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom, yet refuses to reverse the crime or restore the nation.
• The United States violated its own Constitution by unlawfully seizing a sovereign foreign kingdom in violation of international law.

🧠 True Significance

This case is not a defeat — it’s a roadmap. The corrupt court never disproved the Kingdom’s continued existence. It merely hid behind procedural technicalities to avoid confronting the monster under its robe — colonial occupation by legal fiction.

• Lorenzo’s claim remains unrefuted in law.
• This case proves that restoration is possible — but must be accompanied by overwhelming evidence, legal documentation, and public exposure.

📚 Legal Legacy

To this day, no court has dared to honestly rule on the legitimacy of the Hawaiian Kingdom — because doing so would implode the entire U.S. empire of fraud in the Pacific.

The Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands lawfully exists under international law. The U.S. knows it. The courts know it. And one day, the world will know it — and stand to see justice done.

📜 Read Public Law 103-150 — The U.S. Apology for the Overthrow (1993)

🌺 Understanding “Ko Hawaiʻi Pae ʻĀina”

Ko – possessive particle, here meaning “of” or “belonging to”

Hawaiʻi – the Hawaiian islands

Pae ʻĀina – “archipelago” or “group of lands/islands”

---

So, “Ko Hawaiʻi Pae ʻĀina” means:

• The Hawaiian Archipelago
• The Group of Lands Belonging to the Kingdom of the Hawaiʻian Islands
• Informally translated as: “The Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands” in this cultural-political context

Contact

Reach out with documentation, talk stories, or support:
Email: Aloha@PublicLaw103150.com